Junhyun Lee vs Taisei Ichikawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 08:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Lee vs T. Ichikawa

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Ichikawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Junhyun Lee winning 2 and Taisei Ichikawa winning 0. The last match between Junhyun Lee and Taisei Ichikawa was at the M15 Karuizawa, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Junhyun Lee getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lee | 1 |
| Ichikawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Karuizawa(06-04-25)
J. Lee vs T. Ichikawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.94% (54-52) | Career Total W/L | 50.20% (128-127) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Lee vs T. Ichikawa Match Preview:
- Second serve efficiency reveals that Ichikawa, with 42.6% of points won, slightly outshines Lee who sits at 41.34%.
- In terms of returning second serves, Ichikawa demonstrates strength, winning 52.63% of points compared to Lee's 47.04%. Is this enough to tilt the advantage towards Ichikawa? Quite possibly.
- When returning first serves, Lee holds a narrow edge, claiming 31.3% of points, while Ichikawa is close behind at 28.55%.
- Under pressure, both players show similar resilience in saving breakpoints, with Ichikawa edging Lee at 52.63% to 51.13%.
- Considering overall match performance over the past year, Lee has a slightly superior win rate at 60.61% compared to Ichikawa's 52.17%.
- When playing on their best surfaces, both share a 55% win rate, with Lee favoring hard courts and Ichikawa excelling on clay.
- Lee has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 225.39 versus Ichikawa's 461.3, which could indicate Lee is more battle-hardened.
- In deciding sets, Lee has a significant advantage, winning 50% of such contests, whereas Ichikawa manages just 35%.
- Lee also converts break points more effectively, at 40% compared to Ichikawa's 38.14%.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming match, several factors point towards a close contest between Lee and Ichikawa.
Their second serve performances are comparable, yet Ichikawa has a slight edge, potentially important in key moments.
The ability to return second serves may be Ichikawa's best weapon, providing an upper hand in interrupting Lee's service games. However, Lee's ability to return first serves slightly better is worth noting.
Evaluating pressure situations, both players show strength, but Ichikawa's marginally better breakpoint saving percentage could prove pivotal.
Lee's advantage in overall match performance and experience against tougher opponents might instill greater confidence in tight scenarios.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Lee's track record demonstrates a better winning percentage, which might be crucial.
Factoring in these observations, while Ichikawa exhibits strengths and slight advantages in several areas, Lee's consistent performance and toughness against ranked opponents suggest that he is the likely contender to triumph in this contest.
Junhyun Lee vs Taisei Ichikawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Lee vs T. Ichikawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:15:40 | Average Match Time | 1:15:40 |
| 68% (32/47) | 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) |
| 84% (27/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (24/40) |
| 47% (7/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (27/57) | Return Points Win % | 28% (13/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Lee Recent Matches Played
T. Ichikawa Recent Matches Played

J. Lee vs T. Ichikawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.94% (54/52) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.20% (128/127) |
| 50.21% (121/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.19% (300/286) |
| 50.11% (1175/1170) | Games Win/Loss | 50.44% (2812/2763) |
| 54.76% (46/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.48% (96/98) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (21/18) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 60 | Aces Total | 555 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 133 | Total Double Faults | 623 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:15 |
| 197.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.07 |
| 62% (1846/2998) | 1st Serve % | 64% (9646/15123) |
| 62% (1150/1846) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6345/9646) |
| 45% (515/1152) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2682/5477) |
| 48% (130/271) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (624/1523) |
| 41% (1167/2867) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6106/15258) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 50.94% (54/52) | Futures W/L | 49.78% (114/115) |
| 50% (53/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (123/249) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (11/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (36/68) |
| 53% (16/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (32/81) |
| 87% (54/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (131/108) |
| 11% (54/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (131/22) |
| 12% (52/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (123/17) |